Psychoanalytical criticism revolves around one’s mind. The
roots of the criticism stem from psychologist Sigmund Freud, concentrating on
the conscious and unconscious processes within a person. These processes can
affect how one interacts with others, how they think, their attitude, moral
judgement, and their behavior itself. According to Freud’s structural hypothesis
about mental functioning, the mind can be broken down into three entities: id,
ego, and superego. The id is really all about meeting one’s needs or wants instantly,
commonly in reference to sexual desires. The ego deals more with reality and
serves as the mediator between the superego and id. In other words, it tries to
meet the desires of both the id and superego in a more realistic way, mainly aiming for self-preservation. It tries to find a balance between our desires
and consequences of those desires. The superego on the other hand is based on
the conscious which solely reflects on moral judgement: right or wrong.
Another major part of psychoanalytical criticism is defense mechanisms. These are techniques used by the ego to regulate one’s drives while discouraging worries. Among these defense mechanisms are: ambivalence, avoidance, denial, fixation, identification, projection, rationalization, reaction formation, regression, repression, and suppression. For the most part the word themselves describe what type of defense mechanism is at hand.
The psychoanalytical criticism is very complex because it
has so much to it, but when applied to actual media you gain a better
understanding of it. In closing, as the textbook says, “Psychoanalysis is,
remember an interpretative art. It seeks to find meaning in the behavior of
people and in the art they create.”
No comments:
Post a Comment